Written by Karl vom Dorff Sunday, 07 November 2010 11:11
3dEyes submits the results of testing BeZilla, WebPositive & Arora on Haiku using Google's V8 Benchmark Suite and then comparing these results with Firefox, Chromium and Arora on Ubuntu. The results seem to indicate very good performance of Arora in Haiku (with QTWebkit); with scores roughly four times better than the native browser WebPositive. Who said Qt on Haiku wasn't a good idea? It's also noteworthy that there's relatively little difference in performance running Arora with Qt on Ubuntu vs Haiku. Chromium on Ubuntu takes the cake though, blowing away everything else (although, we all know what Google Chrome is based on; a third party test would remove suspicion in this regard).Hardware: Core Quad Q8200, RAM 2Gb
OS: Haiku r39330
Browsers:
- BeZilla 2.0.0.22pre
- WebPositive 545
- Arora + QtWebKit 533.3
- Arora + QtWebKit 534.10 (trunk)
Hardware: Core Quad Q8200, RAM 2Gb
OS: Ubuntu 10.10 and Haiku r39330
Browsers:
- Mozilla Firefox 3.6
- Chromium 7.0
- Arora + QtWebKit 533.3
- Haiku: Arora + QtWebKit 534.10 (trunk)
- 4022 - Chromium 7.0 (Ubuntu 10.10)
- 2173 - Arora + QtWebKit 533.3 (Ubuntu 10.10)
- 2164 - Arora + QtWebKit 534.10 trunk (Haiku r39330)
- 557 - WebPositive r545 (Haiku r39330)
- 536 - Arora + QtWebKit 533.3 (Haiku r39330)
- 356 - Firefox 3.6 (Ubuntu 10.10)
- 62.6 - BeZilla 2.0.0.22pre (Haiku r39330)
Top Downloads in 30 Days
Free Heroes of Might and Magic II
DosBox 0.73
Firefox (Bezilla)
BeOS 5 PE Max Edition
VLC Media Player
Search Files
Newest Files
May 14 |
Powder |
| May 12 |
GUIsetdecor |
| May 8 |
QupZilla 1.2.0 |
| May 6 |
D52, D48 and Dz80 |
| Apr 30 |
Quassel |